Skip to main content

The Fisher-Graham Investing Debate: Quality vs. Value

Warren Buffet's comment about his investment strategy is one that most people involved in the stock market have read at least once... "I’m 15 percent Fisher and 85 percent Benjamin Graham".

Here's an attempt to help newcomers grasp what's being said. Philip Fisher approach was qualitative understanding of the business and it's management while Ben Graham taught quantitative understanding of price and value.

Qualitative Understanding of the Business and its Management (Philip Fisher's Approach):

Business Analysis: This involves thoroughly researching and understanding the company's core business operations. Philip Fisher emphasized the importance of gaining insights into how a company operates, its industry dynamics, competitive advantages, and growth prospects.

Management Assessment: Fisher believed that the quality of a company's management team was crucial to its long-term success. Investors should evaluate the competence, integrity, and vision of the executives running the company. Are they making sound strategic decisions? Do they have a track record of prudent capital allocation?

Competitive Advantage: Fisher encouraged investors to identify businesses with durable competitive advantages, often referred to as economic moats. These advantages might include strong brand recognition, proprietary technology, a loyal customer base, or cost leadership. Companies with economic moats are better positioned to withstand competition and generate consistent profits.

Growth Prospects: Fisher's approach also emphasized the importance of a company's growth potential. He advocated for investing in companies with long-term growth opportunities. Fisher believed that such companies could provide superior returns over time.

Long-Term Perspective: Investors following Fisher's approach tend to have a long-term investment horizon. They are not focused on short-term price fluctuations but rather on the fundamental strength and potential of the businesses they invest in.


Quantitative Understanding of Price and Value (Ben Graham's Approach):

Intrinsic Value: Benjamin Graham's quantitative approach involves calculating the intrinsic value of a stock, which represents its true worth based on fundamental financial data. This is done by analyzing a company's financial statements, earnings, book value, and cash flows.

Margin of Safety: Graham introduced the concept of the "margin of safety," which suggests that investors should only buy stocks when they are trading at a significant discount to their intrinsic value. This margin of safety provides a cushion against potential losses and unforeseen risks.

Price-to-Value Comparison: Investors following Graham's approach compare the current market price of a stock to its intrinsic value. If the market price is significantly lower than the intrinsic value, it may indicate a potential investment opportunity.

Diversification: Graham also advocated for diversification to reduce risk. By holding a portfolio of undervalued stocks, investors can spread risk across multiple investments.

Market Timing: Graham's approach is often associated with a more defensive and conservative investment style. Investors are less concerned with market timing and short-term market trends and instead focus on the fundamental analysis of individual stocks.


In summary, the qualitative understanding of the business and its management, as taught by Philip Fisher, emphasizes understanding the company's operations, management quality, competitive advantages, and growth prospects. On the other hand, the quantitative understanding of price and value, as taught by Ben Graham, involves calculating intrinsic value, seeking a margin of safety, and being less concerned with market timing, with a focus on undervalued stocks. Warren Buffett's investment philosophy combines elements of both approaches, creating a balanced and successful investment strategy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Growth Calculation with negative numbers

Once in a while, you face a situation wherein growth % is to be calculated – where one of the number is negative. Here’s quick approach and my thoughts. Ideal approach used to calculate the growth is  Approach 1: (Current Number / Old Number) -1 Few people follow the approach of differential, like Approach 2: (Current Number – Old Number) / Old Number Both are good to use as long as both the numbers are positive. Let’s take a quick example:  Scenario 1:  Say Previous quarter profit was at 100 and current quarter profit is at 120 – growth in profit would be calculated at 20% using either of the formula. Approach 1: (Current Number / Old Number) -1 = (120 / 100) -1 = 0.2 or 20% Approach 2: (Current Number – Old Number) / Old Number = (120 – 100)/100 = 0.2 or 20% Scenario 2: Assume that current quarter there is a loss of 20 and previous quarter was profit of 100, in this case outcome would be as follows: Approach 1: (Current Number / Old Number) -1 = (-20 / 100) -1 = -1.2 or -120% Appro

Decoding Technical Recessions: What They Mean for the Economy in Simple Terms

With news around Germany sliding into a Technical recession, here's basic explainer. Introduction: Economics can be full of complex terms and ideas that may sound intimidating, but they have a big impact on our daily lives. One such term is a "technical recession." In this blog post, let's break down what technical recessions are, what they mean for the economy, and how they affect us in simpler words. What is a Technical Recession? A technical recession happens when the economy of a country goes through a decline for six months in a row. It means that the total value of goods and services produced within the country (Gross Domestic Product or GDP) has shrunk for two consecutive quarters. This shrinkage indicates a decrease in economic activity and overall production. The Implications: A technical recession has several effects on both individuals and the economy as a whole. Firstly, people tend to spend less money during a recession. We become more careful with our fi